Remove tag infringement
article thumbnail

Apparel retailer Tiger Mist fined for misleading consumers over returns

Inside Retail

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) issued two infringement notices in relation to the statements made on the brand’s returns page on February 21. The brand said the garments should be sent in their original packaging, tags intact, unworn, unwashed and unstained.

Apparel 246
article thumbnail

Apparel retailer Tiger Mist fined for misleading consumers over returns

Inside Retail

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) issued two infringement notices in relation to the statements made on the brand’s returns page on February 21. The brand said the garments should be sent in their original packaging, tags intact, unworn, unwashed and unstained.

Apparel 246
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Lorna Jane fined $5 million for “predatory” anti-virus activewear marketing

Inside Retail

The information was removed in July 2020 after receiving backlash from consumers and medical practitioners alike, but that the products’ garment tags continued to state they provided permanent protection against pathogens until at least November 2020.

Marketing 264
article thumbnail

When creativity gets reduced to a commodity: What is the real cost of dupes?

Inside Retail

When a knockoff goes viral Sakr explained that she was first made aware of the Barney Bed dupe on TikTok after numerous accounts tagged her in a video showcasing Aldi’s dog bed. Our latest products such as the BarneyCurl have IP protection so we intend to vigorously pursue any future infringements,” Sakr concluded.

article thumbnail

Beauty dupes are all the rage, but are they ethical? It’s complicated

Inside Retail

We value and respect intellectual property rights and do not infringe on the rights of other cosmetic companies. This raises a question: Is the manufacture and promotion of beauty dupes enabling consumers to be more empowered and less restrained by premium price tags, or is it feeding an industry of uninspired copycats?